We return to court, before the judge Daniele Carlo Madia, even if today’s hearing will be interlocutory, except at the moment unexpected, to define the future of ACR Messina.
The stage had been fixed previously with respect to the postponement (to 10 October) of the presentation of a proposal for the composition with creditors or the other tools on which the consultants are working with the accountant by the accountant Antonio Morgante. Two months of postponement granted for the failure to respond by some creditors who would not have allowed to draw up a defined and detailed return program. The bankruptcy judges in essence had considered the “justifying reasons” given by the company to grant the extension, proven by the preparation of a project to regulate the crisis and the insolvency (pursuant to the article 44 of the bankruptcy subject). The serious reasons to which reference was made, referred to in article 39, are concretely lacking answers that according to technical jargon would have led to the so -called “credits circularization”.
Last August, still “danced” the solution for the outsourcing of sports management, with the negative judgment expressed by Commissioner Maria di Renzo on the hypothesis of the takeover of the Doadi, the blow and response via PEC and the picture in some way later placed with the appointment of Giuseppe Peditto as general manager by Aad Invest and Pietro Sciotto, through President Stefano Alaimo.
At Palazzo Piacentini, the collegial hearing today provides for the appearance of the parties, the Prosecutor on the one hand with the substitute Fabrizio Monaco and the lawyers of the company on the other. The different positions will be put on the table and the next hearing will probably be set, after 10 October: the one that will probably mark a real furrow on ACR intended as a company (unlucky at the moment from the federal sphere): a possible ok on the concordat plan or the opening of the judicial liquidation should arrive.