The differentiated autonomy of art. 116 of the Constitution in reading the book “Shot to the State” by Antonio Riccio It was the theme of a meeting-debate entitled “differentiated autonomy, the pros and cons” which was held today at the National Library of Cosenza, wanted by Prof.ssa Rosita Paradisomanager of the Forma-Polo Bruitium high school in Cosenza and who involved authoritative speakers.
The intervention of Maria Locantodeputy mayor of the city of the Bruzi. In addition to the author, they intervened Msgr. Giovanni Checchinato Metropolitan archbishop of Cosenza-Bisignano, the prof Antonio Viscomi of the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro and the prof Giampaolo Gerbasi of the Unical, with whom the students of the ITE – Technical Economic Institute interacted. The autonomist culture of a “regional nation in a nation” that does not want to express a crusade against the state but, if anything, the multi-level governance of our times depending on the administrative efficiency, was a cause for careful reflection. We asked ourselves about the evolution of regionalism and what is meant by asymmetrical regionalism. The combined regulations of articles 2,3.5 and 117 of the Constitution has made it possible to frame, in the name of a unitary citizenship, the reference to a state that the constituents wanted regional and social. The possible regressive impact was compared with the reform of Title V and, from here, the consideration of the universality and effectiveness of fundamental rights, I travele this which in full marries a discipline appointed, at the forefront, to educate to values with values, such as civic education. The awareness and sense of participation were then well highlighted as a current moment, as expressed by the many questions asked by students and students, protagonists of the day. A day that saw the students approach the institutional world and confront each other on important issues that promote participation in civic and social life.
