In the session last Friday, the City Council approved three urgent variations to the budget. On the first relative practice “to the application of quotas of the provision envisaged for the litigation fund in order to allow the continuation of the obligations to recognize off -balance sheet debts and to cope with potential liabilities”, the councilor Doris Lo Moro (Pd) has detected an inconsistency of 116 thousand euros. An observation that sent on Tilt Giunta and managers. BIOFO reiterated that “the prospects are correct and the attachments are precise. The manager’s report is inaccurate and not incorrect.
The auditors expressed themselves on the numbers of the prospects and there the numbers return ». In practice, the inaccuracies was in the report that accompanies the resolutions and whose manager Nadia Aiello took responsibility for the responsibility. An error on which the opposition has hit a tight debate. The councilor Gianpaolo Bevilacqua (Gianpaolo Bevilacqua mayor), together with many others, complained of the absence in the classroom of the Board of Auditors. The councilor Annita Vitale (action) has pointed out that “the relationships that accompany the variations are the main tool that allows you to understand what happens within the budget. This we are noting is not only a technical data of imprecision but is also political. It is then to be said that the auditors’ report is scarn ».
The complete article is available on the paper and digital edition