Iran challenges the West, Moscow warns: “A US intervention would destabilize the entire Middle East”

John

By John

Tehran raise the tone of international confrontation, while Fly relaunches a clear warning against any direct involvement of United States in the growing tension between Iran And Israel. A multi -level crisis is proposed on the horizon, with geopolitical implications that risk overwhelming the regional balance.

Ali Khamenei: “Iran will not give up on war or imposed peace”

During a speech broadcast live by Iranian state TVthe Supreme guide Ali Khamenei has pronounced statements that sound like an explicit warning: «The Iranian nation will firmly resist one War imposedas well as one peace imposed. There will be no surrender ». Khamenei then warned that a possible American military intervention it would cause «irreparable damage».

In a context marked by the relaunch of the regional ambitions of Tehranthese words strengthen the Iranian position as a power unwilling to suffer external dictates, neither in the war or negotiating fields. The message is directed to Washingtonbut also a Brussels and all the western chancelleries who fear a new escalation.

Russia: “A US attack would be a strategic error”

To increase the dose is the Deputy Foreign Minister Russian, Serghei Ryabkovwho warned the United States against a possible Direct involvement in the crisis. «A similar step would radically destabilize the situation throughout the Middle East», He told the agency Interfax.

Commenting on the rumors about the possible Supply of military aid directed to IsraelRyabkov defined the scenario “dangerous even only in terms of speculation”. There Russiaadded, keeps active communication channels both with Tehran both with Tel Avivrole that confirms the intent of Kremlin to act as a strategic balance in the Middle Eastern framework.

On the level of intelligence, too Serghei Naryshkinhead of the Russian external services, confirmed direct contacts with the agencies of Iran And Israela sign that Moscow observes all development on the ground closely.

The European Union between diplomatic prudence and nuclear red line

In Brussels, the official position remains anchored to not interference on the internal political processes of Tehran. “A change of regime does not fall into the agreed position of theEU»Said the spokesman for External action service, Anouar el anouniduring a briefing with the print.

However, the union firmly reiterates that theIran “He must never have or acquire nuclear weapons». A diplomatic formula that intends to balance the political dialogue with the adamant opposition to a possible atomic Iranian military program, a point that remains one red line shared by all 27 Member States.

Scenario: Escalation risk and global energy crisis

Behind the rhetoric, concrete risks emerge. A direct conflict engaging United States, Iran And Israel could shatter the safety balances in the gulf, with serious repercussions on the oil transit in the Strait of Hormuz and on the entire global economy. The recent oscillations of the price of crude oil are a first alarm bell.

In this context, every diplomatic or military move takes on a disproportionate weight. There strategic communication becomes part of the game, and the messages launched by Khamenei And Ryabkov They must be read as preventive signals, if not real notices of retaliation.