The Tar of Catania rejected the appeal filed by Marcello Scurria Against the provision with which the President of the Region Renato Schifaniin the guise of commissioner for the renovation of the slums of Messina, had revoked the position of sub commissioner himself. “The motivation of the revocation provision – reads among other things in the sentence – assumes connotations of marked simplicity and can certainly coincide with the recourse of the relationship of trust between revoking and revoked, by virtue of reasons expressly enunciated or in any case deduced from documents and behaviors documented in court”.
The TAR explains that “in the contested provision, the reasons that, in the exclusive evaluation of the extraordinary commissioner, have determined the provision of the trustee relationship with the sub commissioner” are expressly referred to “. For the Board “The motivation of the revocation that leverages the lack of” connection and information integration “, considered by the commissioner necessary in relations with the sub commissioner,” especially for important acts such as participation in a judicial auction for an huge real estate acquisition “, not only does not contrast with the size of the powers delegated to the sub -commissioner and is not manifestly illogical, but it is consistent with the highly fiduciary and collaborative nature of the assignment in questionof aid and support to the commissioner in the delicate functions that these are called to perform in his role “. The judges also deemed the intervention” ad opponendum “of the Municipality, which opposed the appeal of Scurria as a counter -interested party.