The acquittal sentence has become definitive, issued last July by the collegial court of Palmi, against the Lametine entrepreneur Giancarlo Arcieridefended by the lawyer Lucio Canzoniere. Arcieri was acquitted with the formula “Because the fact does not exist” by all the charges contested to him, in particular by the accusation of external competition in the mafia association, to participate in a criminal association aimed at the commission of corruption crimes, and a fictitious header of contracts to encourage companies attributable to the Piomalli gang.
The dissemination measure of the company also becomes definitive Lewis Medica Srlattributable to Arcieri himself, and the related corporate shares.
The entrepreneur had been involved as part of the “Chiron” operation and subjected to house arrest in March 2021, in execution of an order from the district investigating judge of Reggio Calabria. The precautionary measure had remained in force for over a year. Since the first guarantee interrogation, Arcieri had declared his total extraneousness to the contested facts.
The lawyer Lucio Canzoniere stressed that the sentence confirm what has already been supported by his client at the time of the guarantee interrogation before the investigating judge of the Court of Reggio Calabria. In particular, it was highlighted that the alleged quality of occult member of Archers in MCT Company had already been the subject of evaluation by the Court of the Reggio Calabria Review Court, which had canceled the precautionary order in relation to this accusation.
The Court of Palmi, in the now irrevocable absolute sentence, highlighted how precisely this charge represented the “arches of the entire accusatory theorem” against the accused, implicitly confirming that it was a serious judicial error that could have been avoided from the beginning.
With the acquittal of Giancarlo Arcieri and the release of the entire company’s company of Lewis Medica, a long and complex judicial affair closes, returning to the entrepreneur the dignity and honor of a man described by his defender as “of mirrored morality, who has always marked his life and professional activity to respect the rules and to the moral.