“The statements of representatives of the government who speak of politicization of the judiciary, which describe a simple compulsory communication as “guarantee notice” and judicial response to the reform on the so -called separation of the careers of the magistrates appear unfounded».
The Sectional executive junta of Catanzaro of the ANM Which in a note argues that “the deposit at the Public Prosecutor of the Republic of a detailed lawsuit against any person obliges the prosecutor’s office to register the names of the accused in the register of crime news”.
“In the event that subjects who play the role of ministers are registered as investigated – continues the note – to greater protection of the political mandate, the constitutional law nr. 1 of 1989 requires the prosecutor’s office to communicate their registration. Therefore, the obligation, to which the prosecutor cannot escape, is aimed at guaranteeing the wider defense of the subjects concerned well before investigations are held against them, thus being able to immediately present memories and ask to be heard. It is a simple compulsory communication that is very different from a warranty notice ».
In the judgment of the Anm Catanzaro “the invoked need to accelerate the approval of the reform itself also reveals its clear punitive nature for the judiciary. A conscious exploitation of the information conveyed cannot fail to ascertain, which feeds a dangerous climate of mortifying distrust in the institutions “. “The gest of Catanzaro – concludes the note – expresses full solidarity with the Public Prosecutor of the Republic, attacked for having only carried out his duty”.