The seat reserved for the trade union component of the Council of the Chamber of Commerce was up to the Cisl Messina. To say it, now, is also the Administrative Council of Administrative Justice of the Sicily Region which has rejected the appeal filed by the other trade union organizations against the first pronouncement of the Catania TAR. The lawyer Santi Delia, who defended the Cisl Messina in the two degrees of justice, showed that the count of the union representation in the area (CISL against CGIL-UIL appearance) had not been correctly executed and certified within the terms provided for by the regulation. Furthermore, throughout the procedure, access to the documents was repeatedly requested but it was possible to gain only with an imposition of the judge.
“Justice was made in compliance with the workers and the people we represent – is the comment of the Secretary General of Cisl Messina, Antonino Alibrandi -. And this second sentence is the confirmation of the transparency with which CISL Messina faced the whole affair. We have been silent when, however, others in the press cheered for “having slammed the CISL out”. We were silent after winning the first degree of judgment, although aware of our reasons ».
“We believe we have been unjustly excluded, as has now been established, by an important and fundamental organism for the economic life of the territory – added Alibrandi -. Now, with the sentence in favor of us even in the second instance, we claim that those of competence followed by this sentence and apply the provisions of the judges and that the CISL is inserted within the body. Sorry, however – he concludes -, that two degrees of judgment have served to enforce a right and union representation of the territory. But we confided on the outcome of the result because CISL has always operated in terms of transparency and legality “.
“The CGA – explains the lawyer Santi Delia – said the principle according to which” in a procedure where the parishness between the participants is at stake “, and in particular in an” electoral procedure (to which the one that regulates, under a condicio regime, the procedure for the choice of the representatives at the Chamber of Commerce can be equated) can be invoked “only in residual form and to the purposes of mere regularization” and in any case only if ” The principles of the electoral procedure is incompatible (with the times e), confirming the thesis that since the use of the TAR we had stated with force and that had led to the commissioner of the Chamber of Commerce for the phase of access to the documents “.