The parents of the of the newborn kidnapped six months ago in the clinic of the Sacred Heart in Cosenza, The Chiappetta-Cavoto spousesthrough his own lawyer, the lawyer Chiara Pennaasked the public prosecutor to appeal to the revocation of house arrest in Rosa Vespa. “We have proposed an application to the public prosecutor in order to solicit the appeal of a provision that is inadmissible for us because nothing has never been notified. Nor the first instance with which the house arrest was asked with electronic bracelet, nor the second with which the house arrest were asked without electronic bracelet, not being the same at the moment available. This second instance, among other things, does not even see the opinion of the public prosecutor. We are a procedural technical problem because we have been ousted from the contradictory, which instead is foreseen for crimes violently on the person “.
“Having said that – continued the lawyer Chiara Penna in a note – we are not interested in where Mrs. Vespa is. CThe interests that the road of the gentlemen Chiappetta and Cavoto and their children never crosses again. But above all we are interested in that the precautionary needs are actually protected. And not towards Sofia, it is clear: I totally exclude something to the little girl can happen. I am referring to a danger of reiteration in general considered the picture that emerges from the documents. The prosecutor’s coach considered the defendant fully capable and of medium psychiatric danger. For the rest we wait to know how the investigating judge will be determined and if it will accept the request for abbreviated rite conditioned to the skill. We hope so, because after undergoing tests and interviews with the other coach, he refused to undergo interviews only with our consultants thus demonstrating full capacity for self -determination and discernment. Finally we will be able to tell ours on several aspects “.
“I only add one thing. More amazing than this provision, only the idea that the investigators seems to really believe that none of Vespa family members was aware of nothing appears. That the husband and all the family members believed in the story that a fifty-one-year-old woman, with fibromatoso uterus and a delicate operation that he put- I quote the defensive acts that we did not know before, but today, in question, the fact of being able to be pregnant, managed not only to conceive, but to give birth naturally and to return home in just 24 hours, all alone, without anyone ever being around her. Precisely in consideration of the ongoing miracle and the socio -cultural level of the family as well as Moses, it is truly an incredible story “.
The lawyers of the suspects: no to the media processes
Lawyers Gianluca Garritano And Teresa Gallucci, defenders of Moses Oogo and of Vespa rosethe couple accused of kidnapped a newborn baby in a clinic in Cosenza last January, they replied, in a note, to the statements of the defenders of little Sofia released after the news of the house arrest granted to Rosa Vespa. «We learned from the local media the declarations made by colleagues who assist the offended parts in the criminal proceeding against Rosa Vespa and Moses Oogo. It is our costume not to issue statements that follow the merits of the procedure, because convinced that the trials must be carried out in the classrooms of the courts and not in newspapers and on social networks. The sacredness of the courtroom cannot and must not be replaced by media processes “.
“We care, however, to clarify some circumstances and explain the reasons for certain defensive and procedural choices – add the lawyers -. The investigating judge of Cosenza, at the defensive and favorable opinion of the proceeding public prosecutor, deemed the absence, at present, of precautionary needs such as to justify the precautionary custody in prison. The measure applied today, house arrest with the application of the electronic bracelet (as soon as it will be available), was considered absolutely sufficient to guarantee a possible danger of reiteration of the crime. Crying to the scandal for modifying a precautionary measure in prison with other less afflicting measure, but always strongly limited to personal freedom, is acceptable by social haters and not by those who practice the forensic profession. In addition, we continue, with the use of the media, to insinuate doubts about the possible responsibility also of the family members of Rosa Vespa ».
«Personal beliefs, it is well known, can never enter the evaluation of the criminal test by a judge. The procedural documents categorically deny any participation of other subjects in the contested offense. Finally, as regards the request, rejected by the defendant, to undergo a visit by the consultants appointed by the counterparty colleagues, we represent that it was a defensive choice dictated by assessments that will be addressed exclusively in the appropriate offices and, in any case, these choices cannot represent a starting point for medical-psychiatric conclusions, because, if so, the technical assessments would not acquit their function. We hope that future technical-procepal issues will be addressed in the classrooms of the Courts, given that, as recently reiterated by the criminal Chamber of Cosenza, justice is “in the name of the people” and not “justice of the people”.