Felice Calabrò, the two congress motions of the Democratic Party seem to have found an agreement. She had filed an appeal precisely on the regularity of the congress. Change your position?
“If there is an agreement between two motions I can only be happy, because it means that there is the possibility of building something positive in the future. But I context the regulatory aspect and that remains, I did not participate in the congress for this reason and my position does not change, it would have been the same even if instead of Armando Hyerace he had won Alessandro Russo ».
What is this regulatory aspect?
«There are two issues. The first is connected to the membership, in my opinion the congress is not regular because it was allowed to participate even in 97 members who have been registered with the paper method. In this regard, the regulation provided for a series of conditions in the individual clubs, not respected. The cards will certainly be regular, I don’t want to recall old adagues, but I have not been guaranteed to all the same conditions. But the strangest thing ae another ».
Which?
“The congress regulation was drawn up in the early months of 2024 and it was said that the congress had to be celebrated by April 18, 2024. On the basis of this it had been established that the registry of the members would freeze on 31 December 2023. Then for a whole series of motivations everything continued forward, and the congress took place at the end of October 2024 2024? A paradox was created: those who registered in April were unable to vote, and perhaps they could make him registered in 2023 who then, in 2024, did not renew the membership. Here, I am challenging the illogicality of this path. And I wait for the regional commission to decide, after a series of ballets ».
At what point are we?
«The National Guarantee Commission said it must be the Regional Commission to decide. We are waiting. By March 12, I will present a summary memory and insist on the appeal ». And to say that someone claimed that the appeals were a way to force their hand for an agreement.
«They are considerations that I reject the sender, evidently to say it is those who think they act in this way. And then the appeal should have been a lunch for what? We are talking about charges of a party of which, I want to remember, I am group leader in the city council ».